Evaluación de estenosis carotídea en pacientes subsidiarios de revascularización miocárdica / The evaluation of carotid stenosis in patients who can benefit from myocardial revascularisation

Introducción. La estenosis carotídea (EC) crítica es frecuente en pacientes pendientes de revascularización miocárdica (RM), aumenta el riesgo de ictus durante la cirugía y su diagnóstico es importante, aunque el tratamiento sea controvertido cuando coexisten ambas patologías. Objetivos. Estudiar la lesión carotídea en pacientes pendientes de RM y los factores asociados. Determinar la morbimortalidad de la cirugía combinada carotídea y la RM frente a cirugías separadas. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio prospectivo, observacional y consecutivo durante 16 meses; se realiza dúplex carotídeo en 140 candidatos a RM, y consideramos la EC crítica: lesión carotídea ≥ 70%, con un 72,9% varones y una edad media de 69,8 años. Realizamos análisis estadístico con SPSS 10.1, chi al cuadrado y test exacto de Fisher: p £ 0,05 es significativamente estadística. Resultados. Prevalencia de lesión carotídea: 16,5% EC ≥ 50%, 10% EC ≥ 70%, pero sólo 7,1% quirúrgicas, ya que cuatro casos fueron oclusión carotídea. 42,6% angor inestable, 5% fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo < 30%. Encontramos asociación significativa entre EC crítica en este tipo de pacientes con las siguientes variables: enfermedad cerebrovascular en el 37,5% de los casos (p = 0,009); lesión de tronco coronario izquierdo (TCI) ≥ 50% en el 22,2% (p = 0,002) y no padecer diabetes (p = 0,028). Practicamos cinco cirugías secuenciales: endarterectomía carotídea (EAC) seguida de RM cuatro cirugías combinadas y una RM emergente sin EAC. La morbimortalidad de la RM en pacientes con EC < 70% fue: 0,61% mortalidad, 0,69% morbilidad –seis infartos agudos de miocardio (IAM) y tres ictus–. En EC quirúrgicas hubo un exitus, un IAM. Conclusiones. Consideramos indicación primaria el estudio con dúplex carotídeo en estos pacientes; es especialmente importante cuando existe lesión del TCI significativa (≥ 50%) y enfermedad cerebrovascular. Proponemos cirugía combinada en pacientes cardiológicamente inestables y es recomendable en lesión del TCI ³ 50%, aunque sean necesarios ensayos clínicos que mejoren la indicación

Introduction. Critical carotid stenosis (CS) is frequent among patients who are waiting for myocardial revascularisation (MR), it increases the risk of stroke during the operation and it is important to diagnose it, although when the two pathologies coexist there is some controversy about treatment. Aims. To study carotid lesions in patients waiting for MR and the associated factors. We also intended to determine the morbidity and mortality rates of combined carotid and MR surgery versus separate procedures. Patients and methods. The study was prospective, observational and consecutive over a period of 16 months; carotid duplex was performed in 140 candidates for MR and the CS was considered to be critical: carotid lesion ≥ 70%, with 72.9% males and a mean age of 69.8 years. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 10.1, chi squared and Fisher’s exact test. p £ 0.05 is statistically significant. Results. Prevalence rate of carotid lesions: 16.5% CS ≥ 50%, 10% CS ≥ 70%, but only 7.1% surgical, since four were cases of carotid occlusion. 42.6% unstable angina, 5% severe left ventricle ejection fraction < 30%. We found a significant association between critical CS in this kind of patients and the following variables: cerebrovascular disease in 37.5% of cases (p = 0.009); left coronary artery trunk (LCT) lesion ≥ 50% in 22.2% (p = 0.002) and not suffering from diabetes (p = 0.028). Five sequential surgical procedures were performed: carotid endarterectomy (CE) followed by MR four combined interventions and one emerging MR without CE. MR morbidity and mortality rates in patients with CS < 70% were: 0.61% mortality, 0.69% morbidity –six acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) and three strokes– and with surgical CS there was one death and one AMI. Conclusions. We consider the use of carotid duplex as a primary indication in the study of these patients; it is especially important when there is significant injury to the LCT (≥ 50%) and cerebrovascular disease. We propose combined surgery in cardiologically unstable patients and it is recommendable in LCT lesion ³ 50%, although further clinical trials are needed to improve the indication

Infragenicular bypass graft for limb salvage using polytetrafluoroethylene and distal vein cuff as the first alternative in patients without ipsilateral greater saphenous vein.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the results of polytetrafluoroethylene infragenicular bypass grafts with a distal interposition vein cuff in patients with critical limb ischemia in the absence of ipsilateral greater saphenous vein. From January 1997 to June 2002, 58 consecutive below-knee bypass grafts with PTFE and distal interposition vein cuff were performed in 57 patients with a median age of 70.8 years. The distal anastomosis was located at the infragenicular popliteal artery in 18 cases and at tibial vessels in 40. Primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. During a median follow-up of 14.4 months (range, 1-50) 26 cases of graft occlusion and 19 major amputations were registered. The primary and secondary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 57%, 54%, and 47% and 61%, 58%, and 50%, respectively. Limb salvage rates reached 69%, 69%, and 59% at 12, 24, and 36 months. When below-knee revasculanzation is required in patients with limb-threatening ischemia, in the absence ipsilateral greater saphenous vein, PTFE grafts with a distal vein cuff are a reasonable substitute with acceptable long-term patency and limb salvage rates.